I'm getting weary of the "_________ for Vice-President!" stuff by my fellow Dean supporters every time someone puts in a good performance at a debate.
The veep-to-be this time is Sen. John Edwards, who avoided overtly attacking Dean and put forth some excellent points during the confab. He and Dean actually were extremely civil to each other - almost flirting with each other when Dean apologized for misquoting him earlier in the campaign.
So naturally, there's a choir of voices calling for Edwards to be the V.P. on a Dean ticket. Why? It seems most of us who are like-minded, who read up on the issues, who read blogs. who comment at blogs...are perfectly capable at any given time to put in a stellar performance in a roundtable.
Let's slow down on the VP talk until we have the P.
